ME 6102: Designing Open Engineering Systems
Offered Every Spring

Credit Hours: 3-0-3
Prerequisites: Graduate standing in engineering or related discipline
Catalog Description: Decision-based integrated product and process development; meta-design and decision support problems; mathematical modeling of decisions involving ambiguity and uncertainty; critical thinking and analysis; verification and validation; research issues
Textbook: No textbook required
Instructor: Farrokh Mistree (Spring 2004)

References: Articles to be specified

 Goals:

To provide a scientific foundation for the development of design models (Decision-Based Design) and methods (Decision Support Problem Technique) and design support tools (Decision Support Problems). This covers two of three areas that were deemed to be crucial to reforming the practice and teaching of engineering design.1 Specifically, provide an opportunity for students to learn how

Desired Student Outcomes

Prerequisites by topics:

Topics:

Open engineering systems

Identification, characteristics, metrics (robustness, modularity, adaptability, mutability), research issues.

Decision-Based Integrated Product and Process Development

Meta-design: Designing design processes.
Designing with decision support problems.
Design examples and open issues.

Design Support Tools

Attention Directing Tools
Planning Tools
Decision Support Problems

Mathematical modeling of Decision Support Problems

Modeling the design equation for integrated product and process development.
Modeling openness: robustness, modularity, adaptability, mutability.
Modeling design freedom.
Modeling quality and affordability.
Modeling ambiguity and uncertainty.

Nature of critical thinking and analysis

Deep reading: Critical Thinkers.
On critical evaluation including the posing of questions.
Verification and validation.

Computer tools

Phase Event and Information
Attention Directing
Partitioner
Decision Support Problems
Delivery mode (%):
Lecture
100%
Discussion
Seminar
Independent Study
Demonstration
Grading Scheme (%):
Mini Project
10%
Assignments
10%
Project
65%
Critical evaluation of accomplishments and learning   10%
Class participation   5%

__________________________

1 See C.W. Hoover, J.B. Jones, et al. Improving Engineering Design: Designing for Competitive Advantage, National Research Council Report, National Academy Press, Washington DC, 1991.

__________________________
Revised June 2004